🔔Alerts
Login to get notifications!
🗨ī¸Forum

🎞ī¸Movies & TV


🌐Junk

🔍
Search keywords
Join➕ Now!   or       đŸ”Ŋ Forgot Password?
avatar
🚸

Worst Movie Case?

by Ballz

May '17 *
image I own a lot of movies in quite a few different cases. Most are simple, your standard keep cases. Others are different and not used often, but they're clever. And then some are different and not used often, because they suck. Whoever designed them must have been out of their mind to think anyone would enjoy storing movies in them. I have three to present from my own collection. They're sets, which partially explains the nutty cases.



image First, Alien Quadrilogy, a DVD set from 2003. I believe the guideline must have been something like, "Make the set take up as much space as possible." I'm guessing it's the first time it was ever released as a set on DVD and as far as the content goes, it's impressive. But just look at how much it can spread out when you open it and that's not even at its full length!

Separate cases for each movie (two discs per movie, plus the bonus disc, so five cases) wouldn't have taken up much more room than when the set is when folded up and would have been less annoying to open. At least it unfolds from the middle, meaning you never need to open it all the way. I don't own this series on Blu-ray yet, but it seems like all future sets were smarter about the cases.

image Next up, RoboCop Trilogy, a DVD set from 2006. I must admit, the case isn't as bad as I was remembering, but I'm including it because it's still kind of stupid. I feel like I'm playing with a Transformer when I'm trying to open and close it. It only fits in its sleeve if it's folded up correctly too, so if you're an idiot like me, you'll probably have to open and close the flaps a couple times before you get it right, especially those vertical flaps.

Why are those flaps even there? They serve no purpose beyond supporting the giant image. There's no information about the discs on them besides 'RoboCop Trilogy' at the top. That could have been placed elsewhere. Or not at all. Pretty sure the words 'RoboCop' on each disc are enough of a notification as to what set I'm looking at.

image And last, Twin Peaks: The Entire Mystery, a Blu-ray set from 2014. Seems like a decent set in the picture, yeah? I thought so too. Until I started flipping through when I first got it, checking the discs to make sure none were damaged. That was when it dawned on me that when I get to the later discs, I'm going to be doing a lot of flipping. Of course, just being cardboard flaps, I'm afraid to flip them too fast out of fear of bending or tearing them. Then I got to the end and the whole part holding the flaps decided to detach from the glue holding it to the case.

I'm guessing the glue doesn't stick well to the slick cardboard. I saw other reviews complaining about that problem, so it seems pointless to send it back. It probably happens to all of the sets sooner or later. There's a slightly cheaper set in better, less artsy case, but it's missing the bonus disc. Can't win. Unless you don't care about the extras on that disc, then you do win if you go with the cheaper set.


image I know I said I have three bad cases to present from my own collection, but I have one more. It's not in my collection anymore however, lasting only one day. It was Clint Eastwood: 35 Films 35 Years, a DVD set released in 2010. I saw it at Costco and there was no question in my mind about buying it, especially since I still hadn't seen a lot of Eastwood's movies at that time. The first sign of trouble was when I opened it at home and there was glue on the discs. I tried to wipe it off and then started watching.

Of course, it wasn't long before the disc started skipping and freezing. I scanned a couple other discs in DVD Shrink and it couldn't even finish the scan, so I knew it had to go back. Fortunately, Costco's cool about taking back already opened movies. I guess the set was doomed to fail, because even if there wasn't the glue, the discs were double-sided in cardboard sleeves. Incredibly foolish on Warner Bros. part and apparently they repeated themselves with the later Clint Eastwood: 40-Film Collection.

Though this whole article was created as a result of recently buying the Twin Peaks set, I reminded myself of this https://youtu.be/VsdzaEVeFEE video from Cinemassacre where bad cases and some other stupid things about DVDs are brought up. Well-worth a watch.

Got any movie cases in your collection that top these disasters?


🚸
avatar
Ballz says:
#7, Reply to #1

May '17
I wouldn't be upset if they stopped using cardboard on all movie cases, outside of slipcovers or boxes for keep cases in a set. Overuse of cardboard definitely cheapens the value. With how complicated some of those cardboard sets are too, I'm pretty sure a few keep cases in a box instead would be cheaper for the manufacturer anyway.


🚸
avatar
Ballz says:
#8, Reply to #2

May '17
I've got a few cases with those layered discs. Complete pain in the ass. I'm also always worried that the bottom disc will scratch the top disc since they're such a tight fit.


🚸
avatar
Ballz says:
#11, Reply to #3

May '17
Yeah, I remember that collector's edition. Kind of wanted it, but now I'm glad I never got it. Not sure how Anchor Bay fucked that up so badly, because I thought their other releases were pretty great.


🚸
avatar
Ballz says:
#12, Reply to #4

May '17
I'd watch them more often too. At least snap cases seem to be going extinct. Don't remember the last time I bought a new release that was in a snap case.


🚸
avatar
Ballz says:
#9, Reply to #5

May '17
I don't mind those thin cases, at least the few I've got. They're part of a set though, so they have a nice cardboard box to sit in. Not as cheap looking as those TK Maxx ones sound like.


🚸
avatar
Ballz says:
#10, Reply to #6

May '17
Weird that they'd release the same set in two designs in the same year. Your Alien Quadrilogy set sounds a lot better than mine. I've got a few cases with broken centers for holding the disc. I figure it's either the postal service not being careful or someone at whatever warehouse the movie shipped from.


🚸
avatar
Ballz says:
#16, Reply to #13

May '17
Outside of the one part coming unglued, yeah, it's sturdy. And I can always reglue that part. Just really not a fan of the layout. I didn't realize your Blu-ray cases were thicker there. I've got a few that are thicker, but they're collector's editions and are thicker than even most DVD cases. The couple steelbooks I own are nice, but I can't justify paying the price most companies seem to want for them.


🚸
avatar
Ballz says:
#17, Reply to #14

May '17
Cardboard sleeves are awful, though I thought they were supposed to be okay with Blu-rays because of that anti-scratch coating? Not that it justifies the cheapness on the manufacturer's part of using cardboard sleeves to begin with. They charge more for Blu-rays and when all you get are some cardboard sleeves, you feel like you got ripped off.


🚸
avatar
Ballz says:
#21, Reply to #20

May '17
That actually looks identical to the layout of the Twin Peaks Gold Box DVD set, just clear plastic pages instead of blue. Never had a problem with it. Too bad they don't use that design for more sets. No others I've bought are like that anyway.


🚸
avatar
Ballz says:
#23, Reply to #22

May '17
I like how that looks. I get what you mean though. I've seen other sets I wouldn't want to own purely based on the bulky design. That one's deceiving too. I'd think it was the same height as a normal case.



Loading...


Loading...
@ am
You have reached the end of Trash Epics.